|
|
|
|
Introduction
by Maireid Sullivan
On rights and responsibilities of citizenship— political accountability, public health, and economic justice:
Investigative Journalists, Whistleblowers, and Citizen Journalists champion egalitarian political principles by bringing corrupt individuals to justice and by holding to account those who would undermine public interests.
Who will receive credit for contributions to public accountability and transparency?
When scholars wish to validate a new finding or insight they seek credit for their contributions via peer review in professional societies and journals, and proceed to try to convince universities to publish their findings. Whereas, in politics, secrecy oaths are fundamental to maintaining control of the ‘party line’. When public policy standards and laws are broken, every effort is made to prevent public discovery of failed internal mechanisms. Most public servants earn tertiary degrees or diplomas to prove that they understand academic peer review methodologies, yet they are often prevented from meeting those standards in government administration, or prevented from receiving credit for their contributions when they reveal a failure of internal oversight, hence ‘whistleblowers’ and investigative journalists must step into the role of insuring accountability and transparency, and peer review, in the public interest.
When
the score is a cacophony, we must face the music!
There are times when we are expected to take sides. Those times often present hard choices that carry great risk with no predictable outcome - and require great courage. While critics condem the targeted nature and the irresponsible revelation of unredacted identities others appreciate and support the courageous work of 'public intellectuals'. |
". . . the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception.”
- Mark Twain, (1835-1910), The Mysterious Stranger and Other Stories
Diversity hit between the eyes as old media pockets about 90% of big tech cash
The free money isn't enough to hurt the increasing revenues of big tech, but it is enough to hurt Australian journalism.
Christopher Warren Feb. 24, 2021, Crikey
Excerpt:
With the amendments to the mandatory news bargaining code released overnight, Australia has ended up with the worst possible deal
...
Old media got what they wanted: free money.
...
This free money will undermine media diversity by subsidising old media and by prioritising their content on the web, making almost uncrossable the gap between their resources and the resources of start-ups. It threatens to hurry on the death of printed papers.
Big tech has also got what it wanted: no regulatory restraint on its continued deepening data collection or its algorithmic processes which is how it wields power and makes money.
...
While the government’s national sovereignty grandstanding is exposed as so much hollow rhetoric, it’ll be satisfied that it’s successfully threaded the needle that keeps both old and new power centres more or less happy.
...
Both sides are eager to spin how well they’ve done, usually by conflating cash transfers with in-kind arrangements.
. . .
It’s good for the right-wing voices both Facebook and News Corp amplify.
It’s the worst news for just about everyone else. >>>more
Is Social Media a Threat to Democracy? (pdf)
by Pierre Morad Omidyar, French-born Iranian-American founder of eBay, now journalist.
Introduction: Point of View
October 9, 2017
The advent of social media introduced transformative platforms for people to share thoughts and information in entertaining and connective ways. But the benefits are increasingly being overshadowed by negative consequences as the monetization—and manipulation—of information threatens to tear us apart.
In an op-ed published in The Washington Post on October 9, I mentioned a paper, written by a team from two of our organizations—Democracy Fund and Omidyar Network—called, “Is Social Media A Threat to Democracy?” I’m pleased to share that paper with you here.
Addressing these issues will take input and influence not only from government entities and the technology industry, but also from members of civil society, like you. A healthy democracy relies on informed and engaged citizens, and we hope this research empowers you with detailed information you need to better understand the current threats posed by social media.
Perhaps most of all, we hope this research inspires you to join the conversation and find opportunities, big and small, to help protect our democratic values.
See dedicated page on the Benefits of Social Media HERE |
Philosophy
Back to top
What Western journalists could learn from Buddhism
by Dr. Mark Pearson, Professor of Journalism and Social Media,
Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
Interviewer: Richard Aedy, Thursday 3rd September 2015
MEDIA Report: ABC Radio National, Australia
Summary
It's not enough to sign up to a list of media ethics if you don't have a strong moral framework underpinning it all. And Western journalists might find some useful ideas in the mindfulness philosophy of Buddhism.
See transcript and podcast HERE
The Eightfold Path is one of the Four Noble Truths:
"The four truths therefore identify the unsatisfactory nature of existence, identify its cause, postulate a state in which suffering and its causes are absent, and set forth a path to that state."
|
 Mark Pearson: The basic eight points are:
1. Right understanding
2. Right aspiration or intention
3. Right speech
4. Right action
5. Right livelihood
6. Right effort
7. Right mindfulness
8. Right concentration
Now, each of these was actually spoken and then written in Buddhism as a means for training monks in spiritual integrity, but they are very easily adapted to one's life [and] also to journalism, as a moral code. It's basically saying, firstly, do you have the right understanding of the situation and with journalists that means research; it means have you really paused to explore this; have you spoken to enough people? |
| "We need to work far more closely with industry, politicians and the media. None of these groups are the enemy, they are part of the group that will sort out these problems, and if we don't work with them there is no way we will ever beat it." - Matthew England, Professor and Laureate Fellow, Centre for Marine Science & Innovation, University of New South Wales, ABC Science Show, 8 June 2013 (Transcript) |
The Public’s Right to Know
Back to top
How Roger Ailes Built the Fox News Fear Factory-
In Rolling Stone (June 9, 2011), Tim Dickinson reported on Roger Ailes (1940-2017), the man who advised every American Republican president since Richard Nixon: "The onetime Nixon operative has created the most profitable propaganda machine in history. Inside America’s Unfair and Imbalanced Network. Quote: 'He was the premier guy in the business,' says former Reagan campaign manager Ed Rollins. 'He was our Michaelangelo.' ... The network, at it's core, is a giant soundstage created to mimic the look and feel of a news operation, cleverly camouflaging political propaganda as independent journalism." >>>more
Allies threatened to cut off intelligence: Australian Federal Police
Foreign spies are using journalism ‘as a cover’ in Australia, spy agency ASIO has told a press freedom inquiry as the nation’s top cops revealed an allied country had threatened to stop sharing intelligence over one leak to the media.
By Claire Bickers and Clare Armstrong, Aug. 14, 2019, The Daily Telegraph, News Corp Australia Network >>> more
Spy agency ASIO makes submission to press freedom inquiry –
but keeps it secret
Peter Greste, of Alliance for Journalists’ Freedom, urges spy agency to be transparent and make an open submission
The Guardian, 7 Aug 2019
Spy agency Asio is being urged to make a public submission to a parliamentary inquiry into press freedom, as the government considers whether changes are needed to national security laws to protect journalists. ...
Media companies, including News Corp, Nine and the ABC, have used their submission to the inquiry to urge the government to unwind the criminalisation of journalism and add safeguards such as a right to front court and contest applications for search warrants against reporters. >>>more
"When journalists are silenced, democracy and human rights suffer." - Alliance for Journalists’ Freedom
Is the 'phenomenon' of "citizen journalism" under threat when objectivity is a precondition of journalism?
History of Citizen Journalism
by Donald Matheson, 2014, Professor of Journalism, University of Canterbury New Zealand
Excerpt from Introduction:
Citizen journalism’s rise is paradigmatic of how journalism and the media are evolving. A history of citizen journalism—also sometimes called network journalism, participatory journalism, Web 2.0 journalism—is therefore also a chronicle of shifts in the nature of news, the authority of professional media producers, the media business, the shape of public debate, and the technologies of social life more generally. That history divides broadly into two threads, one about change and one about continuity. >>> more
"A role for journalists, if not as gatekeepers, at least as curators."
Scientists Aim To Pull Peer Review Out Of The 17th Century
By Richard Harris
NPR, February 24, 2018
Excerpts:
Another concern is that today scientists are judged primarily by which journal publishes their work. The greatest rewards tend to go to scientists who can get their papers into major journals such as Science, Nature, and Cell. It matters less what the actual findings are. . . .
And if a top journal reviews a paper and decides not to publish it, the scientist needs to start the process of getting to print all over again — which is a waste of resources. "Science moves slower because research isn't available immediately," O'Shea said at the meeting. "To me, those are big problems."
One way forward is to encourage scientists to make their work publicly available on the Internet before it has been peer-reviewed or accepted in a journal. Biologists are starting to do that, using a preprint server called bioRxiv. Physicists have been doing this for years.
Peer review can come later, Eisen says. In fact, he's putting together a system that will facilitate that, and it's set to debut this summer.
"What we want to see happen next is to allow the scientists who are reading papers [as part of their normal work] ... to review them," he says.
As he envisions it, "you post a work, people comment on it, you update it, and if it gets better through that process, that's great — now you've produced something good," he says. "If, through the process of review and assessment, you and the community realize the work wasn't right, it just sorts of fades and you mark it as such. And I think we'll all be better off if that happens."
Notably, it will change the incentives for publication. . . . >>> more |
“Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. ... Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world. ... "Any situation in which some individuals prevent others from engaging in the process of inquiry is one of violence. The means used are not important; to alienate human beings from their own decision-making is to change them into objects.”
Paulo Freire, (1921-1997), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 1970
UCSC Free Download:
2005, 30th Edition (pdf) |
New Ideas on Self-Publishing
Back to top
| BOOK BIZ | Goodman's Plan for Indie Stores
By John Tepper Marlin, May 31, 2017
Peter Goodman's term as board chair of the Independent Book Publishers Association is coming to an end. He has written a full-page swan song…
Goodman says that the problems with the existing system include these four:
• Big publishers have a winner-take-all mentality.
• Lesser-known authors have trouble finding a publisher to bet on them.
• Meanwhile, people with some name recognition (for whatever reason) are recruited to author books, regardless of their ability to generate new ideas or write well, while the real talent is paid off for anonymous ghost-writing.
• Lesser-known writers are discouraged by the lack of support or opportunity to sell their books under their own name.
Goodman calls for a modern Indie Bookstore with the following characteristics:
1. Community driven. TLC for the consumer.
2. Totally wired and plugged in with kiosks for buying books.
3. Based on Print On Demand (POD), with books printed in less than 10 minutes.
4. Multimedia oriented — you can buy e-books, movies, music. WhatEVER.
5. Participatory, a gathering place. Workshops, etc. The Espresso machine right in front. Starbucks and bookstacks, the Barnes-and-Noble coffee-shop model. Walk in and you will find some of the same welcoming embrace as in a coffee shop or a well-run modern public library. Be a bookstore where local writers can leave their books for sale, either offset-printed and cheaply bound, or available as a POD book.
6. No returns! The return policy is a killer for indie publishers. This will limit the books that the bookstore will buy, but it also means that the authors won't suffer when the books come back.
Goodman doesn't pretend this model will happen without some serious changes in the industry. He is asking for a concerted effort to make it a reality. Indie publishers and unknown writers should not have to rely on Amazon. It's not good, he says, for the growth of our culture.
After thoughts
I spoke with a writer for the French equivalent of Publishers Weekly. He said the big problem in the book business is the loss of diversity. Amazon now has 80 percent of the digital book business and 50 percent of the total book-publishing industry, and that is not healthy. It is dangerous.
There is a glimmer of hope in the Indie Book business, as some self-publishers have done very well for themselves. >>>more
|
From "Free Press' to Investigative Journalism
Back to top
~
1949
Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), founded in 1949, with headquarters in Prague, Czechia, is a United States government funded media organization that broadcasts and reports news, information, and analysis to countries in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Caucasus, and the Middle East. Wikipedia
- Press Room
- Journalists, in alphabetical order, cover Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijani, Balkans, Bosnia, Brussels, Bulgaria, Czechia, Georgia, Hungary, Iraq, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Poland, Macedonia, Moldova, North Caucasus, Pakistan, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Syria, Turkey, Tatarstan, Tajikistan, Tashkent, Ukraine, Uzbekistan.
~
1960s
"The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off."
- Gloria Steinem (b. 1934-), journalist and CIA Agent
THE FEMINIST WAS A SPY by Markos Kounalakis, Oct. 29, 2015, University of Southern California Centre on Public Diplomacy
Excerpt: ... Steinem spoke openly about her relationship to The Agency in the 1950s and ’60s after a magazine revealed her employment by a CIA front organization, the Independent Research Service (Hayden, 2014, The Nation).
While popularly pilloried because of her paymaster, Steinem defended the CIA relationship, saying: “In my experience The Agency was completely different from its image; it was liberal, nonviolent and honorable.” ... Long before the formalized concept of soft power, Steinem personified and promoted abroad the vigor and progressive nature of the U.S. youth movement.
~
1985
Reporters Without Borders (RWB) aka Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), was founded in Montpellier, France, in 1985, registered as a non-profit organization in 1995, with headquarters in Paris, France.
RWB/RSF is an international non-profit and non-governmental organization with the stated aim of safeguarding the right to freedom of information. ...
RWB/RSF works on the ground in defence of individual journalists at risk and also at the highest levels of government and international forums to defend the right to freedom of expression and information. It provides daily briefings and press releases on threats to media freedom in French, English, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Persian and Chinese and publishes an annual press freedom round up, the World Press Freedom Index, that measures the state of media freedom in 180 countries.... Wikipedia
~
2001
Truthout
About:
Executive Director Ziggy West Jeffery and Editor-in-Chief Britney Schultz.
Truthout works to spark action by revealing systemic injustice and providing a platform for progressive and transformative ideas, through in-depth investigative reporting and critical analysis. With a powerful, independent voice, we will spur transformations in consciousness and inspire both policy change and direct action. For more on our editorial approach, please read “Remaking Media in the Pursuit of Justice” and
“A Call to the Media: Let’s Go Beyond ‘Preserving Democracy.’”
~
2001
Wikimedia Foundation
About: The Wikimedia Foundation is the nonprofit that hosts Wikipedia and our other free knowledge projects. We want to make it easier for everyone to share what they know. To do this, we keep Wikipedia and Wikimedia sites fast, reliable, and available to all. We protect the values and policies that allow free knowledge to thrive. We build new features and tools to make it easy to read, edit, and share from the Wikimedia sites. Above all, we support the communities of volunteers around the world who edit, improve, and add knowledge across Wikimedia projects.
"When I first created Wikipedia back in 2001, the internet was a very different place. Only seven percent of people worldwide had a broadband connection, and more people spent time building personal websites than getting their news online. I knew what I wanted to create: a free encyclopedia, written by volunteers, for everyone in the…" - Jimmy Wales, 2020
~
2002
The World Press Freedom Index (WPFI) is an annual ranking of countries compiled and published by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) since 2002 based upon the organisation's own assessment of the countries' press freedom records in the previous year. It intends to reflect the degree of freedom that journalists, news organisations, and netizens have in each country, and the efforts made by authorities to respect this freedom. Reporters Without Borders is careful to note that the WPFI only deals with press freedom and does not measure the quality of journalism in the countries it assesses, nor does it look at human rights violations in general.
~
2010
Independent Australia
Founded by David Donovan, Independent Australia is a progressive journal, supporting freedom and justice for individuals, and getting to the truth. IA opposes governments of the country beholden to vested interests. Our main editorial focus is on federal politics, democratic government, the environment, human rights, Australian identity, Indigenous issues, world affairs, economics, finance, health, law and the justice system.
~
2011
The Conversation - Academic rigour, journalistic flair
Who we are
The Conversation Australia and New Zealand is a unique collaboration between academics and journalists... working together, supported by a team of digital technology experts. Our professional editors turn knowledge and insights from academics into easy-to-read articles, and make them accessible to readers like you.
All our work is free to read and free to republish under Creative Commons. We do this as a not-for-profit company guided by a clear purpose: to provide access to quality explanatory journalism essential for healthy democracy.
We place a high value on trust. All authors and editors sign up to our Editorial Charter [Global Editorial guidelines pdf]. Contributors must abide by our Community Standards. We only allow authors to write on subjects on which they have expertise. Potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed... >>>more
~
2011
Media Reform Coalition
About: The Media Reform Coalition’s story starts back in 2011. This was when the Leveson Inquiry into the culture and ethics of the British newspaper industry was launched, following revelations that the News of the World had hacked the phones of victims of crime. A group of academics who were working on the Spaces of the News research project set up the Coordinating Committee for Media Reform – later renamed the Media Reform Coalition (MRC). This brought together academics with over 30 pressure groups to engage with the Inquiry and other areas of media policy.
Over 2011 and 2012, the coalition produced five written submissions for the Inquiry and gave oral evidence. MRC produced Time for Media Reform: Proposals for a Free and Accountable Media, based on our submissions, and our policies were adopted by the Trade Union Council, with the endorsement of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) and the broadcasting union BECTU. >>>more
Media Reform Coalition News, May 2012
James Curran's Rally speech
Excerpt:
We need a policy that shrinks the power of media moguls to set the terms of public debate. ...
First, we need to curb overall media concentration: no company should be allowed to control more than 15% of the revenue of the core media industry. This is such a minimum demand, proposed by Enders, that it should be utterly un-contentious across the political spectrum.
Second, we need to limit control over sub-markets, such as the national news market. >>> more
~
2012
Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF)
Global Non-profit Non-governmental organization
FPF protects, defends, and empowers public-interest journalism in the 21st century.
About:
Our goal is to ensure that all news organizations worldwide recognize that digital security is a critical press freedom issue in the 21st century. To protect journalists, their sources and their audiences, it is imperative that newsrooms use best-available security tools and practices, including encryption of sensitive communications and materials, anonymization of sources, and distribution of news through secure and censorship-resistant channels. >>>more
~
2015
"I was left with the impression that Wikipedia got in just before the deadline, so to speak."
- Robert McChesney, Professor of Communications, University of Illinois and cofounder, in 2003, of the media reform organization Free Press.
Robert McChesney:
We Need to Advocate Radical Solutions to Systemic Problems
By Mark Karlin,
January 4, 2015, Truthout
Robert McChesney, a leader in challenging the corporate media’s role in degrading democracy, carries on this fight with Blowing the Roof Off the Twenty-First Century. In the book, he makes an urgent and compelling argument for ending communication monopolies and building a post-capitalist democracy that serves people over corporations.
Excerpt
Mark Karlin:
In a Truthout Progressive Pick of the Week interview in 2013about your book, Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy, you reflected profound pessimism about the capture of the internet by large corporations – and the evolution of net consumers into marketing “products.” Is the trend of the co-option of the web by a few large corporations accelerating?
Robert McChesney: Whether the process is accelerating is a difficult question to measure or to answer. That the process exists and that it is the dominant fact about the internet is not controversial. Barring radical policy intervention, the domination of the internet by a handful of gigantic monopolists will continue and remain the order of the day. After Digital Disconnect was published, I had a meeting in October 2013 with Sue Gardner, who was then the person in charge of Wikipedia. Sue told me that it would be impossible for Wikipedia or anything like it to get launched by then, because the system was locked down by the giants and privileged commercial values. I was left with the impression that Wikipedia got in just before the deadline, so to speak.
~
2016
Michael West Media
Michael West Media is an independent media publisher covering the rising power of corporations over democracy.
We are non-partisan, do not take advertising and are funded by readers. Our investigations focus on big business, particularly multinational tax-avoiders, financial markets and the banking and energy sectors.About Michael West.
Michael
spent two decades working as a journalist, stockbroker, editor and finance commentator before striking out on his own in July 2016.
After eight years as a commentator with The Australian and another eight years with the Sydney Morning Herald as a journalist and editor, Michael founded this website to focus on journalism of high public interest.
West is a Walkley-award winner and Adjunct Professor at the University of Sydney’s School of Social and Political Sciences.
~
2017
U.S. Press Freedom Tracker -
thoroughly illustrated nonpartisan news website and database.
About
A database of press freedom incidents in the United States — everything from arrests of journalists and the seizure of their equipment to assaults and interrogations at the U.S. border. The Press Freedom Tracker documents incidents across the country, involving national, state and local authorities. >>> more
Columbia University report:
New Website Will Track Press-Freedom Violations
Fall 2017
On August 2, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University joined more than twenty other organizations in announcing the launch of the US Press Freedom Tracker.
Created by the Committee to Protect Journalists and the Freedom of the Press Foundation, the nonpartisan website aims to comprehensively document press-freedom violations in the United States committed by national, state, and local authorities, as well as by private individuals. These might include: journalist arrests, assaults, border stops, camera and equipment seizures, and surveillance orders.
The Knight First Amendment Institute, a nonprofit established by Columbia and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation to defend freedom of speech and of the press in the digital age, serves on the site’s steering committee. The institute is led by Jameel Jaffer, a prominent civil-liberties lawyer. ... >>>more
2019
Democracy's Watchdogs
Melbourne, Australia
Democracy's Watchdogs is a non-profit organisation that educates, provides resources, and celebrates the role Australian investigative journalists play in enhancing democratic processes. The website, https://democracyswatchdogs.org, has video interviews with current and former investigative journalists, their career timelines, books and documentaries and a section with additional resources for students and questions to stimulate classroom discussion. The organisation also conducts a national competition for the best investigative stories by university journalism students.
2022
Wikimedia Foundation
Maryana Iskander appointed Chief Executive Officer on 3 January 2022.
About:
"Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge."
The Wikimedia Foundation is the nonprofit that hosts Wikipedia and our other free knowledge projects. We want to make it easier for everyone to share what they know. To do this, we keep Wikipedia and Wikimedia sites fast, reliable, and available to all. We protect the values and policies that allow free knowledge to thrive. We build new features and tools to make it easy to read, edit, and share from the Wikimedia sites. Above all, we support the communities of volunteers around the world who edit, improve, and add knowledge across Wikimedia projects. |
Yellow Journalism
Back to top
Definitions:
Quoting W. Joseph Campbell, professor of communication at American University, Washington, D.C.
W. Joseph Campbell is an American writer, educator, historian, media critic, and blogger. He has written seven solo-authored books, the latest of which, Lost in a Gallup, examines polling failures in U.S. presidential elections. The book was published in 2020 and has been praised as “well-written, impressively researched, and detailed,” as a “fast-moving narrative history,” and as a “bracing reality check.”
Campbell’s work also includes the award-winning, media-mythbusting book, Getting It Wrong (University of California Press, 2010, 2017). Getting It Wrong inspired critics to refer to Campbell as
“the man who calls journalists on their own B.S.” and “the master of debunk.”
He also is the author of the well-received 1995: The Year the Future Began (University of California Press, 2015) and The Year That Defined American Journalism: 1897 and the Clash of Paradigms (Routledge, 2006).
[Here’s a summary of the 10 myths dismantled in Getting It Wrong]
Wikipedia Overview
Excerpt
W. Joseph Campbell describes yellow press newspapers as having daily multi-column front-page headlines covering a variety of topics, such as sports and scandal, using bold layouts (with large illustrations and perhaps color), heavy reliance on unnamed sources, and unabashed self-promotion. The term was extensively used to describe certain major New York City newspapers around 1900 as they battled for circulation.[4]: (156–160) One aspect of yellow journalism was a surge in sensationalized crime reporting to boost sales and excite public opinion.[5] Mott, Frank Luther (1941) American Journalism. p. 539)
Frank Luther Mott identifies yellow journalism based on five characteristics:[6] "U.S. Diplomacy and Yellow Journalism, 1895–1898"Office of the Historian. US State Department.
1. scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
2. lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
3. use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
4. emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips
5. dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
Origins: Pulitzer vs. Hearst
(Hearst in San Francisco, Pulitzer in New York)
Etymology and early usage
The term was coined in the mid-1890s to characterize the sensational journalism in the circulation war between Joseph Pulitzer's New York World and William Randolph Hearst's New York Journal. ...
On Yellow Journalism, American University School of Communications, Professor W. Joseph Campbell, former professional journalist, "reported from Europe, West Africa, and Asia and from across North America.
He is the author of five books, his latest, Getting It Wrong: Ten of the Greatest Misreported Stories in American Journalism -
Library of Congress lecture:
Summary
W. Joseph Campbell discusses his new book on the ten greatest misreported stories in American journalism. ... "debunks 10 prominent media-driven myths—well-known tales about the news media that are widely believed and often retold but which, under scrutiny, prove to be apocryphal or wildly exaggerated."
Google Books scan: Professor Campbell's Yellow Journalism: Puncturing the Myths, Defining the Legacies, Westport: Praeger, 2001, ISBN 0-275-96686-0
Extract
Turn to the editorial page of any American daily newspaper. If that paper has covered a controversial issue recently, you will likely find a letter complaining about the paper's sensa-tionalistic “yellow journalism.” How did that term, coined in 1897 to deride the mass circulation dailies of William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, become a commonplace of popular press criticism? What does it mean to call a newspaper “yellow,” and why has that label stuck?
Such are the questions addressed by the American University professor W. Joseph Campbell. He aims to debunk the hoary myths that haunt historical and popular accounts of yellow journalism. He wants to settle arguments about who originated the term, who read yellow papers, and whether Hearst actually sent Frederic Remington a telegram promising to furnish a war if the illustrator stayed in Cuba and furnished the pictures. Campbell starts with an operational definition. A newspaper could be described as yellow if it featured multicolumn headlines; covered a variety of topics, including sports and society, on the front page; used illustrations, color, and bold layouts; relied on anonymous sources; and shamelessly promoted itself.
|
Fake News
Back to top
Excerpt
It has long been said (ostensibly by Benjamin Franklin, but we can't be sure) that "democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
My fellow lambs: It's good to be in Memphis and find you well-armed with passion for democracy, readiness for action, and courage for the next round in the fight for a free and independent press.
I salute the conviction that brought you here. I cherish the spirit that fills this hall and the camaraderie we share today. All too often the greatest obstacle to reform is the reform movement itself. Factions rise, fences are built, jealousies mount - and the cause all believe in is lost in the shattered fragments of what was once a clear and compelling vision...
We have to find other ways to ensure the public has access to diverse, independent, and credible sources of information.
- That means going to the market to find support for stronger independent media; ...
- It means helping protect news gathering from predatory forces.
- It means fighting for more participatory media, hospitable to a full range of expression.
- It means building on Lawrence Lessig's notion of the creative common and Brewster Kahle's Internet archives with its philosophy of universal access to all knowledge. >>>more
|
What the ephemerality of the Web means for your hyperlinks
MAY 21, 2021
By John Bowers, Clare Stanton, and Jonathan Zittrain
Columbia Journalism Review
Excerpt
Hyperlinks are a powerful tool for journalists and their readers. Diving deep into the context of an article is just a click away. But hyperlinks are a double-edged sword; for all of the internet’s boundlessness, what’s found on the Web can also be modified, moved, or entirely vanished.
. . .
The data set of links on which we built our analysis was assembled by Times software engineers who extracted URLs embedded in archival articles and packaged them with basic article metadata such as section and publication date. We measured linkrot by writing a script to visit each of the unique “deep” URLs in the data set and log HTTP response codes, redirects, and server timeouts. On the basis of this analysis, we labeled each link as being “rotted” (removed or unreachable) or “intact” (returning a valid page).
Two Million Hyperlinks . . .
...
For an extended version of this research, as well as more information about methodology and the data set, visit https://cyber.harvard.edu/publication/2021/paper-record-meets-ephemeral-web. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
